If you’re reading this page, you’re likely standing at a crossroads, wondering how to secure your future if the unexpected happens. Perhaps the opportunity for a prenuptial agreement slipped by, but that doesn’t mean you’ve lost the chance to safeguard your property. A postnuptial agreement could be the key to the clarity and protection you seek.
Just as no two relationships are the same, every postnuptial agreement should be as unique as the couple that signs it. At Alward Fisher, our team of dedicated attorneys can help you prepare a postnuptial agreement tailored to your specific needs and goals. We have the skills and knowledge to craft a solid postnuptial agreement to provide security for you and your loved ones. With over 100 years of combined legal experience, our firm can offer you the guidance you need. Contact us today for a free and confidential consultation with a postnuptial agreement lawyer in Michigan.
A postnuptial agreement is similar to a prenuptial agreement, with one key difference – timing. A prenuptial agreement or “prenup” is signed before marriage, while a postnuptial agreement or “postnup” is signed after a couple is married. Both documents detail how assets, debts, and other financial matters will be handled if the marriage ends due to death or divorce.
With a prenup, both parties typically have time to review the agreement and seek independent legal advice. In theory, both parties enter the agreement and the marriage with a complete understanding of their rights and obligations.
On the other hand, a postnup is entered into after marriage, when a couple’s financial and legal circumstances may already be intertwined. Postnups can be trickier to enforce and generally offer fewer protections than prenups. However, a postnup is valuable for safeguarding your interests and future in case your circumstances change. With the help of a knowledgeable postnuptial agreement attorney from Alward Fisher, you can enter into a sound and effective postnuptial agreement.
Michigan courts typically rely on two court cases when determining the enforceability of postnuptial agreements: Hodge v. Parks and Wright v. Wright. These cases form the basis of Michigan law regarding postnuptial arrangements.
For one, the court held in both cases that a postnuptial agreement that anticipates and encourages a future separation or divorce is not enforceable. This principle is based on the public policy concern that such arrangements could motivate couples to separate or divorce. Furthermore, the court found in Wright v. Wright that a postnuptial agreement designed to leave one party in a much more favorable position in the event of a divorce was invalid. The court ruled that the agreement was unenforceable, which resulted in the total divestment of all marital property from the defendant.
However, Hodge v. Parks acknowledges that postnuptial agreements are not inherently invalid. Postnuptial contracts that promote harmonious marital relations and keep a marriage intact can be enforceable. The court relied on the ruling in an earlier case, Rockwell v. Estate of Leon Rockwell , which recognized the enforcement of a postnuptial agreement that contained some provisions addressing the possibility of divorce. The court in Hodge stated that no public policy concern arises if a postnup aims to maintain the marital relationship and is equitable to both parties.
A court will look to the facts and rulings in these cases when assessing whether a postnuptial agreement is valid. To understand how these rulings might affect your situation, consult a knowledgeable postnuptial agreement attorney at Alward Fisher for advice and guidance.